GS Paper: GS Paper I | Subject: History — Ancient India | Last updated: 2026-06-09
Covers Class 8 (the board carries both "Lec-7" and "Class-8" — the political history finishes Lecture 7 and the administration begins Lecture 8). It continues straight on from Bindusara (end of lec01). Two halves: (A) Mauryan political history — the First Jain Council, Ashoka's civil war, the Kalinga War and his Dhamma policy, the Ashokan inscriptions, the Third Buddhist Council, and the later Mauryas; and (B) Mauryan administration as described in Kautilya's Arthashastra (territorial, central, spy, judicial, municipal, military, coinage, revenue).
NOTE ON SOURCES (teacher's framing — keep this in mind throughout Part B): Everything about administration rests on three sources, each with a "personality": - Arthashastra of Kautilya — like our Constitution / Lakshmikant: it gives great administrative detail, but it is overly theoretical — a normative text (how things should be), so in the optional there is a standing debate on whether it was actually applied. - Ashokan inscriptions — like the PM's "Mann ki Baat": the king's own top-down account of what he wants (every king is told by his ministers that the moment he appealed for non-violence, people stopped — so treat it with care). - Megasthenes' Indica — like a casual traveller's blog ("hello guys, I've reached Magadha"): entertaining and casual rather than precise, and repetitive (he gives the same "six committees of five" for both the city and the army — which is why municipal & military administration are taught together).
Part A — Political History
Part B — Mauryan Administration (Arthashastra)
What happened (the teacher's narrative): A 12-year famine was prophesied in Magadha, so Bhadrabahu led a large body of monks south (to Shravanabelagola) to survive, taking the memorised literature with them. Remember — no single monk remembered the entire literature; each remembered only some chapters. So when, after 12 years, many of the monks who had stayed back (and many who went south) had died, there was real anxiety that the literature would be lost. On top of this, the two groups had developed a disagreement over clothing — one group now wore white cloth, the other none. To preserve the literature and settle the dispute, the council was called.
This is the very famous result: Jainism split into Digambara and Shvetambara.
| Digambara | Shvetambara | |
|---|---|---|
| Meaning | "sky-clad" (dig = direction / also sky; here shunya = nothing) → wear no clothes | "white-clad" → wear white clothes |
| Basis | follow Mahavira's absolute aparigraha (non-possession = no property, and so no cloth either) | the 23rd Tirthankara Parshvanatha wore white cloth, so wearing white is acceptable |
| View on the literature | hold that all 46 Agamas are lost | hold that 45 Agamas survived (could be recompiled); only the 12th Anga is lost |
CLARIFICATION (the lost text): The original central literature of Jainism = the Agamas (≈ 46). Of these, 45 survived and only one was lost — the 12th Anga, named Drishtivada (in Prakrit, "Ditthivada"). (There were 12 Angas; it is the 12th that is lost.)
DIAGRAM (board): Council details (time/place/president/aim) with a small sketch of Bhadrabahu moving south during the 12-yr famine, then the Digambara | Shvetambara two-column table.
Class board notes (scan):

NOTE (board leftover — the four southern peoples): The board opened with (i) Chola, (ii) Pandya, (iii) Keralaputra (Chera), (iv) Satyaputra — the independent southern peoples named in Ashoka's edicts (they bordered the empire but were not conquered). Carried over from the previous discussion; placed here for continuity.
CLARIFICATION (Avadana): Avadana = "stories of great charities / great deeds." So Ashokavadana literally means the stories of Ashoka's great charitable deeds. These works are also called Upadana (note: not Apadana — apadana is a grammar/vyakarana concept, the ablative case).
After Kalinga, Ashoka transformed each of his old, war-based instruments into a moral counterpart. The whole change is called his Dhamma policy — "rule by morality, to further spread morality."
DIAGRAM (board): Six "before → after" pairs (Chandashoka→Dhammashoka, Bherighosha→Dhammaghosha, Digvijaya→Dhammavijaya, Vihara-yatra→Dhamma-yatra) plus the two new institutions (Dhamma Mahamatra, Dhamma Pracharaka).
Class board notes (scan):

Clean version:
The six points, one by one (this is how the teacher dictated them):
TEACHER'S EXAMPLE (what "Dig" means — directions in Indian culture): Dig means direction (and also sky). Indian culture has 10 directions (the four sides, four corners, plus up and down = a 3-D space of directions). The god of each direction is a Digpala, and the elephant of these gods is a Diggaja (gaja = elephant). This is why "Digvijaya" literally means conquest in all directions.
EXAM FOCUS / PYQ: This is a famous Prelims trap. UPSC once gave an option asking what Ashoka wanted to spread through Dhamma — with "morality" as one option and "Buddhism" as another. A serious scholar gets confused (because there's a genuine scholarly debate); a non-serious one simply writes "morality." At GS level, take Dhamma = morality, which was for the welfare of the people — and move on. (The deeper debate is for the optional.)
TEACHER'S EXAMPLE (the logic of the debate — don't write it, just understand it): The argument for "Buddhism" is: Ashoka sent his son and daughter to spread Buddhism in Sri Lanka; his Dhamma-yatras went to Buddhist pilgrimage sites; the animals and symbols on his pillars are Buddhist — surely a king spreading Buddhism abroad was spreading it at home too. The argument for "morality / consolidation" is: he had just won everything, so he wanted to peacefully consolidate his empire, and morality (like a self-rule ideal) is good for the people. There was even a recent public spat over Ashoka's image — an economic-advisor figure (in a podcast) called him "Chandashoka," an evil/violent man, while others insisted he was "Dhammashoka." (Teacher: we have no psycho-analysis of Ashoka; at GS level, treat Dhamma as morality for the people's welfare.)
TEACHER'S EXAMPLE (would you accept "morality officers"? — why Dhamma must be benevolent): If the Dhamma Mahamatras were oppressive moral police — arresting you for a harsh word on the phone with your mother — no one would accept such a kingdom. So Dhamma, to have worked, must have been morality for the people's welfare, not oppression.
TEACHER'S EXAMPLE (Gandhi was built on Jainism): Mahatma Gandhi's philosophy drew more on Jainism than on Buddhism. The five vows of Jainism — aparigraha (no wealth), asteya (no stealing), satya (truth), ahimsa (non-violence) and brahmacharya — are essentially Gandhi's philosophy (including his much-debated "experiments with brahmacharya"). (Caveat the teacher added: every great person broadly says similar things — no great person ever preached beating the poor or stealing.)
TEACHER'S EXAMPLE (revision — how karma transfers without a soul; the robot/pen-drive analogy): Bollywood reincarnation scenes show the body, soul and karma all reborn (the same actor returns, looking identical) — only so the audience isn't confused. In reality only karma carries forward. Think of a robot that, over its life, auto-writes 10 million lines of code (= its learning = its karma). When the machine is about to die, you copy the code into a new machine — what transfers is the code (karma), not the old machine (the body); even its wrong learning carries over. Now, if you copy the code via a pen-drive, think of that pen-drive as the soul — that's the Jain view (a soul-packet carries the karma). Buddhism says there is no pen-drive at all — the code (karma) transfers directly (like typing it in), with no soul-packet. And how does the karma finally end? Through Upeksha-bhava — a feeling of indifference: staying non-emotional whether good or bad happens; then the accumulated karma slowly disappears. (True in both Jainism and Buddhism.)
Ashoka's inscriptions fall into three groups, distinguished by when in his reign they were cut, what they focus on, and where they were placed.
CLARIFICATION (what exactly is an "edict"?): An edict = a message / an article (its content) — not the stone. If 10 messages are written on one stone, that is 10 edicts; if the same 10 messages are written on another stone, they are still the same 10 edicts. Analogy: the 14th "edict" of the Indian Constitution is about equality — it remains the same edict whether there is 1 copy or 100 copies of the Constitution. So an edict is the message, regardless of how many stones carry it.
TEACHER'S EXAMPLE (language ≠ script — the point most students get wrong): Language is what we speak; script is what we write. Take the word "language" itself: its language is English, its script is Roman. Hindi is written in the Devanagari script (Hindi is the language, Devanagari is the script) — and Hindi can also be written in Roman (e.g. "Ram"). This is why people in Bangalore once broke a board "in an anti-Hindi protest" without realising the board might have been Hindi or English — they confuse Hindi with Devanagari. Two more points he stressed: (1) it is a myth that Hindi/Devanagari has matras the way English has vowels — matra is a way of writing, not of speaking; (2) language is broader than script — many spoken things have no script at all (e.g. the casual "have tea?" sound, or "tch", "kch" — we speak them but can't neatly spell them). So the one-word answer: language of Ashokan inscriptions = Prakrit; script = Brahmi.
CLARIFICATION (two different "Tissa"s — a classic confusion): Do not confuse Moggaliputta Tissa (the council's president) with Tissa / Vitashoka (Ashoka's surviving brother). They are different people — Nehru's Discovery of India (and Bharat Ek Khoj) famously mixed them up.
TEACHER'S EXAMPLE (why Kathavatthu was written as "controversies"): The fight was over philosophy — and the Pitaka of philosophy is the Abhidhamma (recall: Vinaya Pitaka = rules for monks; Sutta Pitaka = teachings of the Buddha; Abhidhamma Pitaka = philosophy). The Abhidhamma had six chapters. If they had simply added a 7th chapter stating one side as "right," the other group's book would have only six chapters → a split in the holy book itself. So instead of declaring a winner, they wrote down both views — the debates — as Kathavatthu (the "points of controversy"), so that everyone could accept the Abhidhamma. Hence Kathavatthu records controversies rather than verdicts.
CLARIFICATION (whose disciple was Ashoka? — depends on the tradition): According to the Hinayana, Ashoka was the disciple of Moggaliputta Tissa. According to the Mahayana, Ashoka was the disciple of Upagupta.
DIAGRAM (board): A yin-yang-like sketch of the Buddhist split, with the Abhidhamma's "6 → +1 = 7th chapter" problem leading to the new chapter Kathavatthu.
Class board notes — see the Third Buddhist Council page in the board PDF (council details + split sketch).
Ashoka's good works (caves): Ashoka donated a group of four caves to the monks of the Ajivika sect; this cave complex is the Barabar Caves (Jehanabad, Bihar).
The later Mauryas:
TEACHER'S EXAMPLE (Ashoka's three famous sons — why grandsons ended up ruling): Ashoka had no direct ruling son, so the throne passed to grandsons. Three sons are remembered: (1) Mahendra — became a monk and went to Sri Lanka; (2) Kunala — was blinded: his step-mother Tishyaraksha (a wife of Ashoka, not Kunala's mother) sent a forged order bearing Ashoka's signature to the local commander to blind Kunala, who duly did so. Years later Kunala, now blind and a singer, came to meet his father; on learning the truth Ashoka was devastated, and when Kunala's son was born Ashoka granted him the kingdom — that son was Samprati; (3) Jalauka — ruled the Kashmir region (per Kalhana's Rajatarangini).
In Mauryan administration the topmost authority is the King and the bottom-most is the village head. The empire was organised into nested territorial units:
DIAGRAM (board): Vertical hierarchy — Rashtra → Vishaya → Ahara → Janapada → Grama — with the officer(s) heading each level.
Class board notes (scan):

Clean version:
CLARIFICATION (governors were princes): In the Mauryan age the provincial governors were princes. For example, Ashoka himself served as the Kumara (governor) of Avanti and Takshila (Taxila) before becoming king. So Kumara = governor (its literal meaning is "prince").
DIAGRAM (board): Vertical chain — King → Mantri Parishad → Mantri → Mahamatya (Mahamatra)/Tirtha → Amatya → Adhyaksha.
Class board notes (scan):

Clean version:
From top to bottom:
Defining features of Mauryan administration (write these as one block): no office was hereditary except the King; there were enough provisions of checks and balances; officers were paid in cash (land-payment to officers begins only in the Gupta age); there was an elaborate spy system; and there were exams to select officers. Together, these indicate a highly efficient administration.
TEACHER'S EXAMPLE (why a department, not a territory — and what the DM still is): There are two ways to assign work — give an officer a territory, or give him a department. Giving a territory is dangerous: the officer "locks his room," lets no one in, and effectively builds his own little kingdom (and could one day revolt). Giving a department keeps central control and accountability. That is why the Arthashastra organises the bureaucracy by departments under Adhyakshas. The modern echo: of the four territorial posts in India (controlling country / state / district / village), the District Magistrate is the one non-elected, territory-holding officer — which is exactly why it is such a coveted post (sometimes sarcastically called the "Indian feudal service"), and why, on democratic principle, territory is otherwise given to elected people.
TEACHER'S EXAMPLE (why exams beat heredity and favouritism): Merit (exams) is the best system we have so far — not because top-rankers provably make better DMs (you can't prove the top 25 ranks outperform the last 25), but because the alternatives are worse. Heredity would have a son inherit his father's post regardless of ability; "lateral"/favouritism sounds attractive ("bring in a great industrialist") but in practice brings favouritism instead of professionalism. An exam-selected officer from a humble background stays loyal to the state because the job is the only source of his family's status — which is why, the teacher noted, none of India's ~200 ambassadors has ever switched sides to the country they were posted in.
The Arthashastra mentions four exams to select bureaucrats — and a candidate had to pass the one exam relevant to the post, not all four:
TEACHER'S EXAMPLE (why character & courage were tested only for some posts — Chanakya's Vishakanya): Not every post needs a character/fear test — but some are far more critical (an ambassador in a foreign country, exposed to honey-trapping, must be incorruptible). The story he told: a neighbouring king, asked by Chanakya to ally with Chandragupta, instead demanded to lead the alliance and ignored the message. A year later, at his own court, his beloved dancer revealed on the eve of his death: "I am a Vishakanya (poison-maiden); my lovers die — I am telling you only because Acharya [Chanakya] said you should know before you die." Chanakya had ten such Vishakanyas working daily near Chandragupta to keep him safe. The shamed king then wrote to his son to accept the alliance and left for the forest. Moral: poor character (and courage) genuinely mattered for sensitive offices — and still does.
DIAGRAM (board): Spy types by source — Arthashastra (Sanchari, Samstha); Ashokan inscriptions (Prativedaka, Pulisani); Megasthenes (Episkopoi/Ephoroi).
(Board: "Spy System" page — see the board PDF.)
The teacher gave the spy system source by source:
DIAGRAM (board): Two courts (Dharmasthiya / Kantakashodhana) + the judicial-officer hierarchy King → Mahadandanayaka → Dandanayaka → Rajjuka → Gramika.
Class board notes (scan):

Clean version:
According to the Arthashastra of Kautilya, there were two types of courts:
TEACHER'S EXAMPLE (the "force" root — and the origin of "Cuttack"): Words like cantonment, contain, Cuttack/Katak share a root meaning force / military force. Katak (near Amravati was the Satavahana capital; Cuttack in Odisha) comes from this same idea — and the North-Indian threat "main tujhe maar ke shuddh kar dunga" ("I'll purify you with a beating") is exactly kantaka-shodhana. The origin of the name Cuttack was asked in the 2023 Prelims.
Judicial offices (top to bottom): King → Mahadandanayaka (central) → Dandanayaka (provincial) → Rajjuka (district — the Arthashastra does not mention a district level, so this comes from the Ashokan inscriptions) → Gramika (village).
CLARIFICATION ("Danda" = justice): "Danda" literally means a stick — the Rajdanda is the king's sceptre / staff of justice, which is why all these justice-officers carry "danda" in their titles. The word survives in the old Bharatiya Danda Sanhita (the IPC) — now replaced (2023) by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
According to Megasthenes' Indica, every city had six committees of five members each — this is the single most important fact (almost every author highlights it).
CLARIFICATION (the six city committees — what each did): 1. Census — register the city's births and deaths. 2. Foreigners — help and keep vigilance over foreigners. 3. Industry / production ("excise") — (metal, mines and salt were state monopolies, which is perhaps why an "excise" function existed). 4. Check the market — every shop had to mention the date and price of its goods. 5. Tax the market sales. 6. Custom / tax on goods entering the city. (The teacher said you need not memorise all six — but "six committees of five members each" is fundamental.)
CLARIFICATION (Megasthenes' Indica is lost): Megasthenes' own Indica is lost; we have it only as fragments preserved in later works like those of Arrian and Strabo.
DIAGRAM (board): Indica's "6 committees of 5" for the army + the Arthashastra's four branches (each under an Adhyaksha) → Chaturangini Sena → Chaturanga → Shatranj → Chess.
Class board notes (scan):

Clean version:
TEACHER'S EXAMPLE (four branches → "Chaturanga" → Chess): Because of these four branches, ancient Indian literature called the army the Chaturangini Sena. From this came the board game Chaturanga (a game based on the four branches of the Indian army). The word travelled: ch tends to become sh in Arabic, so Chaturanga → Shatranj in Arabia, and from there it reached Europe as Chess (played on "checks"). One nice detail: in Indian Chaturanga/Shatranj the Mantri / Wazir moved only one step; in Spain they sped up the game by turning the Wazir/Mantri into the Queen with all her super-powers — giving the modern game.
DIAGRAM (board): Denomination chain — Pana → Ardhapana → Pada → Ardhapada (Ashtabhagika) → Mashaka.
Class board notes (scan):

Clean version:
CLARIFICATION (words that grew from these terms): "pada" later became "padamsha" → the root of "paisa"; and "Samanta", which originally meant a neighbouring king (sama = equal, anta = border → "contemporary/same-time," samkalin), later came to mean a feudal lord / subordinate king — but feudalism (Samantavada) appears only later (Gupta / post-Gupta), not in the Mauryan age.
DIAGRAM (board): "No feudalism"; two central revenue officers (Samaharta, Sannidhata); Indica's Agronomoi (with the road-into-the-forest sketch); the two land types; and the list of taxes.
Class board notes (scan):

According to the Arthashastra of Kautilya:
TEACHER'S EXAMPLE (why a tax-collector built roads — Palm & Finger theory): Don't picture the Mauryans controlling every inch of the map. By the "Palm and Finger" theory, they firmly held the important cities, the highways, and the villages around the highways — they did not go deep into the forest to collect tax. So if an officer wanted to increase the tax base, he built a road into the forest — and that road brought more villages under taxation. That is why tax-collectors constructed rural roads (he is not a pure road-building officer). Modern echo: the Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana is mainly about connecting villages, not building highways.
CLARIFICATION (private vs crown land): - Private land = Kshetra (which over time became "Khet"; Kshetra → Khet as Lakshman → Lakhan, Dakshin → Dakkhin). The state's income from it is the Bhaga (the land-revenue tax). It is tilled by the Krishak (farmer)* / Krishibala (female farmer), and a tenant on it is an Upavasa. (Note: upavasa also means fasting, and "to dwell near/instead" — a likely exam trick on the word "tenant.") - Crown land = Sita land (Sita literally = the furrow made by the plough — the line in which seed is sown; this is the land King Janaka was ploughing when he found the infant Sita). It is managed by the Sitadhyaksha. Here the state's income is the entire profit (so the rate doesn't matter). It is tilled by Karmakara* (hired/paid labour) and Dasa (slaves).
CLARIFICATION (forced labour = Vishti): Vishti (also Veshthi / Vethi / Bethi) — an able-bodied man who pays no tax was made by the state to work 3–4 days a month on its fields or projects (road-making etc.). Ancient books call this "tax via manual labour"; modern scholars call it "forced labour." UPSC asked it (~2017–18) as "tax via manual labour" — so remember both framings.
The teacher gave each tax by the root word so it's easy to remember:
| # | Tax | Root / meaning | What it was |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bhaga | bhaga = share | land-revenue tax; main rate 1/6 (Shadbhaga → "Chhath") |
| 2 | Udaka-bhaga | udaka = water | the Bhaga when the state provides irrigation — higher than Bhaga; a new tax, not a cess |
| 3 | Senabhaktam | sena = army, bhakti = devotion | tax on army movement (villages fed/supplied a passing army; later became "Bhatta" = allowance, e.g. Sena Bhatta) |
| 4 | Pindakara | pinda = village | tax on the whole village (collective — for using forest, highways, rivers) |
| 5 | Pranaya | pranay = love | love-tax in any state emergency (voluntary — like a war-bond paid out of love for the state) |
| 6 | Bali | bali = sacrifice/offering | an old, religious-origin levy ("giving something") |
| 7 | (famine region) | — | a famine region is exempt from tax (the rest of the empire is taxed) — not a tax on famine |
| 8 | Shulka | — | toll tax (Chungi / Naka — the bamboo barrier on the road) |
| 9 | Hiranya | hiranya = gold | any of the above tax taken in cash |
| 10 | Vishti (Veshthi/Vethi) | — | tax via manual labour = forced labour (see above) |
TEACHER'S EXAMPLE (tax named by its rate — and why armies were "quartered"): A famous tax is often named after its rate: the Maratha Chauth was 1/4; the European tithe was 1/10; a hair-tax of 1/16 became "shift" — and here Bhaga's main rate was 1/6. On Senabhaktam: an army 500 km from the capital couldn't wait a month for food, so it demanded food (and even housing) from nearby villagers — exactly the "quartering" that provoked the Quartering Act in the American Revolution (army houses are still called "quarters," from this one-fourth levy).
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| First Jain Council | c. 298 BCE, Pataliputra, president Sthulabhadra → Digambara/Shvetambara split; 45 Agamas preserved |
| Mauryan civil war | c. 272–268 BCE; Ashoka killed all brothers except Vitashoka/Tissa |
| Ashoka | c. 268–232 BCE |
| Kalinga War | c. 268–262 BCE; Kalinga = Odisha + part of Andhra; territorial peak |
| Third Buddhist Council | 250 BCE, Pataliputra, patron Ashoka, president Moggaliputta Tissa → Kathavatthu added to Abhidhamma Pitaka |
| Dasharatha Maurya | c. 232–224 BCE; Nagarjuni caves to Ajivikas |
| Samprati Maurya | c. 224–215 BCE; Jain follower |
| Brihadratha | c. 192–185 BCE; last Maurya; killed by Pushyamitra Shunga |
| Edict | Years | Focus | Placed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minor Rock | early | his devotion to Buddhism (non-descriptive) | rocks; highways & trade routes |
| Major Rock | middle | message to people — how to live by Dhamma (descriptive) | rocks; highways & trade routes |
| Pillar | later | message to later kings — how to rule (both major & minor) | stone pillars; centres of Buddhism |
Language = Prakrit (also Sanskrit, Greek, Aramaic); Script = Brahmi (also Kharoshthi, Greek, Aramaic).
| Wing | Arthashastra | Ashokan inscriptions | Megasthenes (Indica) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Empire head | Chakravarti | Raja / Laja; Devanampriya, Priyadarshi | — |
| Council of Ministers | Mantri Parishad | Parisha | mentioned |
| Top bureaucrat | Mahamatya / Tirtha | Mahamatra | — |
| Dept. heads | Adhyaksha | — | — |
| Spies | Sanstha (stationary), Sanchari (field) | Prativedaka, Pulisani | Episkopoi/Ephoroi (head) |
| City head | Nagaraka | Nagara-Vyavaharika | Astynomoi |
| Revenue | Samaharta (collection), Sannidhata (treasury) | Rajjuka, Yukta | Agronomoi (rural) |
| Military head | Senani (4 branches under Adhyakshas) | — | Commander (6 committees of 5) |
(Updated as relevant news/magazine content comes in)
| Date | Source | Headline | Connection to this topic |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | UPSC Prelims | Origin of the name Cuttack (Katak) | §11 — Kantaka-shodhana (criminal court / "force") |
| ~2017–18 | UPSC Prelims | Vishti as "tax via manual labour" | §15 — forced labour in the revenue system |
| recent | — | Jain museum named after Samprati Maurya | §7 — Samprati, the Jain-follower grandson of Ashoka |